Showing posts with label Israel/Palestine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israel/Palestine. Show all posts

Monday, February 09, 2009

first as tragedy, second as farce

From The New York Times:
In the Israeli parliamentary elections, to be held Tuesday, he is running on a vow to require Arab citizens to sign a loyalty oath. As his campaign slogan asserts with a sly wink at Jewish voters, Avigdor Lieberman “knows how to speak Arabic.”

Mr. Lieberman does not know Arabic and will not, by all polls and predictions, become the next prime minister. But his popularity has been climbing so steeply that his party is now expected to come in third, making him a likely power broker with an explosive and apparently resonant political message: Israel is at risk not only from outside but also from its own Arab population.

“It no longer matters whether Lieberman will get 19 seats, as some polls indicate, or merely 15,” noted the political commentator Sima Kadmon in Friday’s Yediot Aharonot newspaper. “He is the story of this election campaign.”

This guy made his Yisrael Beitenu party because Israel's far right, militarist Likud party wasn't right wing enough for him. He made a dehumanizing threat of violence against Arab Israeli citizens his campaign slogan. A central part of his "peace" plan is revoking their citizenship. And he may soon become one of the most powerful men in Israel.

Just what kind of high government official would he make? Here's a nugget of Lieberman's diplomatic wisdom for ya, in response to a volley of suicide bomb attacks:
"if it were up to me I would notify the Palestinian Authority that tomorrow at ten in the morning we would bomb all their places of business in Ramallah, for example."


Speaking of more right than right, if his party proves as successful in the election as polls indicate, Israel will have elected as its 3 main choices a right wing party, a centrist party, and an uber-right wing party. And we are committed to defending them no matter what.

What could possibly go wrong?

Thursday, January 22, 2009

and speaking of interesting

A former enemy of the United States, Muammar Qaddafi, pens an op-ed in the New York Times on peace in Israel.

NYT on Obama's options in Palestine

I thought this article was pretty helpful in setting the game board. It's interesting, and unfortunate, that Hamas seems to have come out of the Gaza invasion more popular than before, at least in the West Bank. It's especially interesting and unfortunate that such an advance for Hamas is coupled with the likely victory of Benyamin Netanyahu and the bloody-minded Likud party next month. In fact, polls show both Likud and the far-right Yisrael Beiteinu party making huge gains.

The cause of peace has apparently been outflanked after eight years of Republican negligence. I have a bad feeling that Gaza was just the prelude, and I doubt anyone can stop what's coming now.

Friday, January 16, 2009

the real reason Clinton pardoned Rich

I don't often recommend Joe Conason articles, though he is generally thorough and honest with the facts. While we're on the subject of Washington blasphemies, however, I have to recommend this one.

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

perspective

Tom Friedman, always so "serious" about foreign policy, writes a column implying that it's okay to inflict massive civilian casualties because Israel's enemies are "implacably hostile." Apparently, the "Arabs only understand force" line of argument is still all the rage in sensible centrist circles.

Luckily, the New York Times made sure to balance Friedman's column with an editorial by former Israeli soldier Jeffrey Goldberg arguing, instead, that Israel's enemies are implacably hostile and only understand force. Fair and balanced, bitchez!

Wednesday, January 07, 2009

CBS shows segment highlighting humanitarian crisis in Gaza


If there's anything promising to be found in what's going on in Gaza, it's that news organizations are giving the Palestinians a fairer shake than at any time I can remember. Still not fair in the fullest sense, mind you, but better. In fact, this segment contains the first reference (however obliquely) to the ongoing and systematic oppression in Gaza that I can remember seeing on TV.